The coherence function quantifies the linear relationship between two signals as a function
of frequency. It is a fundamental quality metric in transfer function estimation, indicating
how reliably the output signal can be predicted from the input signal at each frequency.
Definition
The magnitude-squared coherence (MSC) between input signal x and output signal
y is defined as:
γ²xy(f) = |Sxy(f)|² / (Sxx(f) · Syy(f))
where Sxy is the cross-spectral density between x and y,
Sxx is the auto-spectral density of x, and
Syy is the auto-spectral density of y. All spectral densities
must be averaged over multiple blocks for the coherence to be meaningful.
Interpretation
The coherence value ranges from 0 to 1 at each frequency:
Coherence Value
Interpretation
γ² = 1.0
Perfect linear relationship. The output is entirely determined by the input through a linear system.
γ² ≥ 0.9
Excellent coherence. Transfer function estimate is highly reliable at this frequency.
0.7 ≤ γ² < 0.9
Good coherence. Results are usable but some caution is warranted.
0.5 ≤ γ² < 0.7
Marginal coherence. Transfer function estimate has significant uncertainty.
γ² < 0.5
Poor coherence. The transfer function at this frequency should not be trusted.
A single FFT block always produces γ² = 1.0 regardless of the actual relationship
between the signals. At least 5–10 averages are needed for the coherence to provide
meaningful information. More averages yield a more reliable estimate.
Requirements
For a valid coherence measurement, the following conditions must be met:
Simultaneous acquisition: Both channels must be sampled synchronously from
the same data acquisition system.
Sufficient averaging: Multiple FFT blocks must be averaged. The number of
independent averages directly affects the statistical reliability of the coherence estimate.
Stationarity: The signals should be approximately stationary over the
measurement duration. Non-stationary signals will produce artificially low coherence.
Adequate SNR: Both channels must have sufficient signal-to-noise ratio.
Noise on either channel reduces coherence.
Parameters
Parameter
Options
Description
Input Channel
Any signal channel
Reference (excitation) signal, typically the force input.
Output Channel
Any signal channel
Response signal, typically an accelerometer or microphone.
Spectrum Size
256 – 65536
FFT block size, determines frequency resolution.
Overlap
0% – 95%
Block overlap. 50% or 66.7% recommended with Hanning window.
Number of Averages
5 – unlimited
Number of spectral averages. More averages improve the statistical quality.
Window Type
Hanning, Hamming, etc.
Window function applied to each block.
Causes of Low Coherence
When coherence drops below acceptable levels, the following causes should be investigated
systematically:
Measurement Issues
Noise contamination: Electrical noise, ambient noise, or sensor self-noise
on either channel degrades coherence.
Poor excitation: Insufficient excitation energy at certain frequencies
(e.g., anti-resonances or frequencies above the excitation bandwidth).
Sensor overload: Clipping or saturation on either channel introduces
harmonics and reduces coherence at the fundamental frequency.
Cabling and grounding: Ground loops or intermittent connections introduce
uncorrelated noise.
System-Related Issues
Nonlinearity: If the system under test is nonlinear, the coherence will
drop because the linear model assumption is violated.
Multiple inputs: If the measured output is influenced by unmeasured inputs
(e.g., background vibration), the coherence for the measured input-output pair will be reduced.
Leakage: Inadequate windowing or insufficient frequency resolution can
reduce coherence, particularly near sharp resonance peaks.
Practical Tips
Always display the coherence alongside the transfer function to assess data quality.
Use force windows for impact testing and exponential windows for the response to minimize
leakage and improve coherence.
If coherence is consistently low across all frequencies, check the channel configuration
and verify that the correct input/output assignment is used.
For modal testing, aim for γ² ≥ 0.9 across the frequency range of interest.
Accept lower coherence only at anti-resonances where it is expected.
High coherence does not guarantee that the measurement is correct — it only confirms
a linear relationship between the two channels. Both channels could be picking up the same
external disturbance rather than the intended excitation-response relationship.