The stabilization diagram is the primary tool for distinguishing physical (structural) poles from computational (mathematical) poles. It plots identified poles across increasing model orders, allowing the analyst to observe which poles remain stable as the model complexity grows.
The horizontal axis represents frequency (Hz) and the vertical axis represents model order. Each pole is shown as a letter marker whose color and symbol indicate its stability classification:
| Marker | Color | Label | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| s | Green | Stable | Both frequency and damping are stable across consecutive model orders. This is the strongest indicator of a physical mode. |
| f | Blue | Frequency Stable | Frequency is stable but damping varies. May indicate a physical mode with uncertain damping or a mode at the edge of the analysis band. |
| o | Red | Not Stable | Neither frequency nor damping is stable. Likely a computational pole — typically ignored. |
| v | Amber | Selected | A pole that has been selected by the user (or by Auto AI) for inclusion in the final modal model. |
A pole at model order n is classified as stable relative to order n-2 if:
| Criterion | Default Tolerance | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Frequency stability | 1.0% | |fn - fn-2| / fn < tolerance |
| Damping stability | 5.0% | |ζn - ζn-2| / ζn < tolerance |
| MAC stability | 0.95 | MAC between mode shapes at orders n and n-2 > threshold |
The stabilization diagram can display background curves to aid in identifying resonance locations:
The summed FRF magnitude is displayed as a gray-filled curve behind the pole markers. Peaks in the FRF Sum correspond to expected resonance locations. Stable pole columns should align with these peaks.
The CMIF is computed from the singular value decomposition (SVD) of the FRF matrix at each frequency line:
The singular values σ1(ω), σ2(ω), ... are plotted as separate curves. Each peak in a singular value curve indicates a mode. Multiple singular value curves help identify closely spaced or repeated modes that appear as peaks at the same frequency in different singular value curves.
| Overlay | Toggle | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
| FRF Sum | Toolbar: Sum | Default view; quick resonance identification. |
| CMIF | Toolbar: CMIF | Closely spaced modes; repeated roots; MIMO data. |
| None | Toolbar: Off | Clean view of pole markers only. |
| Action | How | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Select single pole | Double-click a pole marker | The pole turns amber ("v") and is added to the selected modes table. |
| Deselect pole | Double-click a selected (amber) pole | The pole reverts to its stability color and is removed from the selected modes. |
| Select all stable at frequency | Right-click a pole > Select All Stable at This Frequency | All green "s" poles in the same frequency column are selected, and the best one (highest order, lowest damping variation) is used. |
| Menu Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Select All Stable | Automatically select the best stable pole at every resonance frequency across the entire diagram. |
| Select All Stable in Range | Same as above, but limited to the current frequency cursor range. |
| Clear All Selections | Remove all pole selections and reset the selected modes table. |
| Set Frequency Range | Restrict the visible and analysis frequency range interactively. |
| Add Cursor | Place a vertical frequency cursor for reference. |
| Export Diagram | Save the stabilization diagram as a PNG image. |
Cursors are vertical lines that can be placed on the diagram for reference or to define a frequency sub-range:
Insert.Delete.Ctrl + scroll to zoom vertically.Home.Shift and drag a rectangle to zoom into a specific region.| Setting | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Max Damping Display | 10% | Poles with damping above this value are hidden (likely computational). |
| Min Damping Display | 0.0% | Poles with negative damping below this value are hidden. |
| Marker Size | Medium | Size of pole markers (Small / Medium / Large). |
| Background Opacity | 30% | Opacity of the FRF Sum / CMIF background overlay. |
| Problem | Possible Cause | Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Diagram is empty | Model order range too low or frequency range excludes all data. | Increase the maximum model order. Widen the frequency range. |
| No stable poles anywhere | Poor FRF data quality or incorrect FRF estimator. | Return to Step 2 and check coherence. Try a different FRF estimator (H1 vs H2). |
| Too many stable poles (cluttered) | Model order range too wide or stability tolerances too loose. | Tighten the frequency and damping stability criteria. Reduce the maximum model order. |
| Stable columns shift with model order | Closely spaced modes or nonlinear behavior. | Narrow the frequency range to isolate the region. Check for nonlinearity (amplitude-dependent frequency shifts). |